Skip to main content

Reduced processing - is this better for more likely acceptance?

  • Shaun Streeter #702680246
      0

    Hi - I just wanted to update this with another clip. I identified a further issue with the pop filter I was using - and have switched to a different filter which I believe allows for a more clear sound. This is a selection of the newer audio. Thank you!

    https://drive.google.com/file/d/1y2rcckhO5_8BqHiKa5UJJl0kCsoNFFTK/view?usp=sharing

    share share
  • Shaun Streeter #702680246
      0

    Hi Hiroshi,

    Thank you for the feedback. So, I am and have always been using a professional condenser microphone. All of the above samples are recorded on a Warm Audio WA-87R2. Between the first recordings and the very last recording, in addition to reducing some of the processing, I did change out the pop filter from a foam style to a higher quality solid mesh screen. I believe that has helped with some of the muffled sound I was getting before. If you could elaborate on where the QC team member was hearing the boominess (which sample and approximate time?) so I can listen for it? Thank you!

    share share

Please sign in to leave a comment.