Skip to main content

A Suggestion for an additional programming step before a Backup Contest is issued

  • Permanently deleted user #711349017
      0

    On a related subject...I always work diligently to deliver a read well before the deadline, and seeing my read languish for hours (and sometimes even more hours) is always painful.  I want the client to get their speedy quickly, because that's the point.  If I bust something to deliver in 20  minutes, the client should see it within the hour, at least, right?  I know the QA team has to sleep, but if time is a key factor, then let's emphasize timeliness for the VO talent and the QA folks, too.  Takes a team to deliver finished audio - GO, team!!!  There is no "I" in team.  Ok, I'll stop now.  :)   -- Cat

    P.S.  If we know the QA team is on break, can you extend the red deadline?  No need to rush to get the bottleneck, yes?

    share share
  • Angela Serrano #830202147
      0

    Hey Mark!

    Sorry for taking forever to reply here.

    In regards to your comment, this is certainly a great suggestion! We recently changed the logic for the backup projects a bit to make it more similar to what you are saying here. Right now, the backup project is created regardless if the original project has a take or not. However, it will be kept on hold while the take (if any) is reviewed by QC. If the original take passes QC, then we will discard the backup and pay the actors that auditioned accordingly, if it is sent out for revision, the backup will be released and sent to the client.

    Does this make sense? Your input is more than welcome!

    share share

Please sign in to leave a comment.