Skip to main content

Response to Voice Bunny Rejection

  • Johnatan Sanchez #362611690500
      1

    Hi Barry,

    We apologize for the delay in our reply. 

     

    Now, let's talk audio!

    Thank you for all your explanations and context, it does help to see where you're coming from and all the resources and equipment you have available to provide great audio quality.

     

    Let's address the main issues here: Room, Hum, Background Noise, and plosives.

     

    • Room and Background noise

      These issues, as you mentioned, could've had been fixed before sending it to us, we do agree on that. But, we have a different position regarding the solution. You mentioned that those could be fixed with EQ, in post, which is one way to see and do it. We much rather fix those issues right from the recording stage, meaning, Acoustic Treatment.
      You also mentioned that you have different recording spaces, we would love to have your most treated space, somewhere that won't require post EQ on your file to fix those issues. 

    • Hum

      It seems like your audio is being affected by some interference. This is very easily fixed, make sure your electrical wires are not running in parallel with your audio wires, that way you can avoid the interference. Also, make sure that your equipment is properly grounded to avoid further electrical issues.

    • Plosives

      We were able to pick some plosives on your audio, again, it has a very easy fix, make sure to use a pop filter, if the issue is still there, try positioning your mic in a slight angle, that way you'll prevent the air hitting directly into the mic's capsule.

    We hope this will help you improve your work with us. It seems like you're a very experienced Pro, we believe you'll find this feedback reasonable, and very easy to apply to your already great recordings.

    Remember, our team is evaluating everything, quality, performance, attention to detail, and following instructions.

     

    Let us know if you have further questions or comments,

    All the best

    share share
  • Héctor Adolfo Ituarte #362404423039
      1

    Hey, Gents!

    Thank you for joining this space, Barry! We appreciate your comments and all the helpful information about your setup. You're certainly working with great gear, especially that Neumann which is a beast of a microphone. I'm no fan of Scarletts, but regardless of my personal preference, they can yield great results. I've tended to some talents with humming/hiss/signal noise using these interfaces and in some forums around the web, one can stumble upon a bunch of references of Scarlett users reporting isolation and grounding issues with select units.

    Reinforcing Johnny's comments on audio, let's dig into the subject from a QC perspective:

    The room acoustics issue is the most concerning of them all because we're adamant about receiving the cleanest audio possible: with as little reverberation and/or room noise. Here's where the amazing qualities of your mic can play against you if the acoustic environment is less than ideal. The sensitivity of your Neumann will make it very susceptible to picking up even the slightest amounts of room echo and ambient noise. If you're recording with a Scarlett at a level of 45% gain or more, this issue will worsen drastically. Here's where the great dynamic range of the mic can help you attain good audio printing no more than -9 dB when tracking, but the need for superb acoustic treatment/isolation remains.

    About the distortion, it's not only a matter of maintaining x levels as per our DAW's meters. Harmonic distortion is an acoustic phenomenon than can be printed into the waveform even if the said wave doesn't reach or exceed the digital threshold of 0  dB. This can be present as low-frequency saturation or other types of coloration at any amplitude signal, depending on mic positioning, proximity effect, and of course the gain level used while tracking. In sum, a waveform needs not to be squared in the digital realm if any frequency ranges saturate in the originating signal, such as it's the case with your rejected recording, which indicates the gain used to track was way too hot. In this case, fixing this waveform in post would've been near to impossible as the waveform presents marked saturation in the mid to high-frequency ranges, along with boominess in the low-end of the spectrum. Furthermore, the waveform indeed peaks at 0.00 dB

    For reference, I've prepared a comparison of the rejected audition vs. an approved piece of audio, made with the same gear. As you'll be able to listen, it has a tiny bit of room echo, just on the threshold of what may be deemed acceptable in any work submitted for this, the most competitive category in Bunny Studio. It also serves to exemplify what an engineer or client would accept from us, to consider the waveform 'malleable' enough to fix in post, although most of our clients wouldn't really go through the processing and thus require that as minimum quality, considering it ready to use audio, as we promise to deliver.

    Finally, I got to say, you have a great voice and reading style! Unfortunately, while personally reviewing application projects (in my MO) I don't critique reading/tone/intention if the quality is not there, to begin with. Might be an oversight on my behalf, but it stems from the fact that most aspiring pros have no problems with delivery as most of the talent we attract are experienced VO artists and announcers. The areas of improvement come in the realm of production –or rather self-production– 99% of the time. As you say, there's no fixing a sub-par voice or an incompetent reader, but when it comes to production and recording, we are all in the same boat, trying to be as perfect and competitive in a market that's continuously expanding, where clients are spoiled for choice.

    I'm pretty sure these suggestions were included in the original rejection, but it doesn't hurt to revisit them:

    A) Try to improve your acoustic treatment/mic location. Follow this link for advice on how to solve room acoustic issues: https://help.bunnystudio.com/hc/en-us/community/posts/203461624-Tip-5-Basic-acoustic-treatment-is-not-rocket-science

    B) Make sure that you're setting your gear to a level that prints a signal of -9 to -6 dB maximum while recording. Listen attentively for any noise in the signal (white noise, humming, etc.)

    C) Always normalize your best recording to -3 dBFS Peak Level. You should not hear any noise (like a balloon letting air out [hiss]), your echoes should be minimal, and there shouldn't be any presence of ambient noise. Remember to lay off the compressors, limiters, or expanders. Use careful low-cut filtering at a maximum level of 96 Hz to remove any boominess/plosives or thumping that might've made it into the recording. A noise gate at around 38 to 36 dB can help with 'cleaning' up any inherent noise from one's gear and certainly helps with other low-amplitude noises.

    D) Scrub through the waveform and listen for mouth noises: clicks, salivation, cheek noise, and breaths. Mute those sounds carefully and use fades if necessary. If you need guidance this process, follow this link: https://help.bunnystudio.com/hc/en-us/community/posts/360006728219-Why-should-I-use-fades-

     

    We hope to hear from you soon!

    - Héctor Adolfo Ituarte (Bunny Studio QC Agent)

     

    share share

Please sign in to leave a comment.