Clients or audio engineers?
Is this is a site catering to Voiceover clients or catering to audio engineers looking to find any possible issue they can? Which anybody who has a DAW and a bit of audio experience can do really. I
addition there are a lot of nitpicking directions a 2-3 db variation required in volume but no post processing allowed. Mono, 16 bit etc etc. I tried to send a retake of my rejected audition due to "breath noise" which I had not removed because the direction for the audition was no post processing, no EQ, no gate, no compression none of the very subtle and useful processing I would send a client that still allows plenty of mixing options for them.
Regardless. from what I've ssen on the web and here in the forums it seems like Voices and Voice 123 would be time better spent. Impressing audio engineers is not something I have a lot of patience for. As a musician I've made six albums and worked with some of the best eingineers and even then it can be an apples and oranges thing one that in this application is a waste of time and money.
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Hi Eric,
Thank you for using this space and sharing your thoughts with us.
As you know, one of the promises we make to our clients is to have all of our work evaluated by professional quality control agents.
We understand how frustrating this must be for you, however, we've seen how our Pros do benefit from the feedback they get from our Agents and how their work improves as well.
We invite you to take this as an opportunity to improve your work. not only with us but in general.